Feb 19 2014

Dealing With Problem Employees – The Fire Extinguisher

Send to Kindle

In the last installment of Dealing With Problem Employees we discussed the fire starter; that person who seems to cause a lot of problems. The opposite is the fire extinguisher. This person tends to stamp out enthusiasm in others and can suck the life out of your company.

If you remember the children’s story, Winnie the Pooh, you’ll recall Eeyore, the donkey who was always negative about everything. Eeyore was a fire extinguisher. This person has never met a suggestion or initiative they didn’t hate and they will not miss an opportunity to tell everyone about it.

A good way to approach these people is to assume their negative attitude comes from experience and that means they may have some valuable, if different ways of looking at an issue. Rather than shunning them, which is the easy and most common approach, bring them into the discussion. Much like we discussed with the arguer, ask them to present their views, but only by providing alternative suggestions. When they present something of value, tell them so. When they resort to just whining, stop them.

It’s true that sometimes it’s not possible to stop the incessant whining, but you’ll usually have much better results when the fire extinguisher begins to realize you value their opinions when those opinions are well presented.

Feb 12 2014

Dealing With Problem Employees – The Fire Starter

Send to Kindle

Dealing with problem employees means knowing who those problem employees are. With the fire starter, this can be difficult.

The fire starter is the person in your organization who spreads discontent. Their efforts may not be overt and sometimes this person can be hard to find. Search them out though, as they are poison.

Look for the person who likes to gossip and spread rumors. They may also be the employee who was passed over for a promotion or who feels they should be in a different, more responsible position.

You must take swift and decisive action and carefully document everything. Talk to the person and try to determine what is causing the behavior. Explain that what they are doing is destroying the work environment and be clear that you will not tolerate their behavior.

You may or may not be able to fix the problem. Don’t take too long trying. No matter how valuable this employee may seem, the damage they can do will far exceed any value they bring to the company. You may need to let them go which is why documenting early is important.

 

Dealing With Problem Employees – The Fire Starter

Dealing with problem employees means knowing who those problem employees are. With the fire starter, this can be difficult.

The fire starter is the person in your organization who spreads discontent. Their efforts may not be overt and sometimes this person can be hard to find. Search them out though, as they are poison.

Look for the person who likes to gossip and spread rumors. They may also be the employee who was passed over for a promotion or who feels they should be in a different, more responsible position.

You must take swift and decisive action and carefully document everything. Talk to the person and try to determine what is causing the behavior. Explain that what they are doing is destroying the work environment and be clear that you will not tolerate their behavior.

You may or may not be able to fix the problem. Don’t take too long trying. No matter how valuable this employee may seem, the damage they can do will far exceed any value they bring to the company. You may need to let them go which is why documenting early is important.

Feb 05 2014

Dealing With Problem Employees – The Arguer

Send to Kindle

Do you have one of those employees who always has a contrary view? You know, the one who is always arguing. For this installment of dealing with problem employees, let’s take a minute to deal with the arguer.

The arguer is the person who always disagrees or presents an opposing view point. Is this always bad? This employee can be irritating and can slow down progress, but they aren’t all bad and one way to deal with them is to accept that they may have a point. Try this.

Tell the person that you would like to hear their opinion but they must first tell you something positive. Tell them that if they can find nothing positive to say, then you will consider that, but you will not accept any more discussion from them on the matter.

Next, tell the person that you would like to hear what they have to say but they must offer alternative suggestions to the points they don’t like.

When you insist on these two approaches, the argumentative person will be forced to be a little more thoughtful about their disagreements. Chances are, they may have some valuable input and when presented with these two restrictions, that input can improve the action you’re taking or considering.

Feb 03 2014

Selecting Future Leaders

Send to Kindle

A recent question got me thinking again about the first step in selecting future leaders: recognizing the raw potential. The questioner wanted some short thoughts on what to look for in potential new leaders. I generally dislike communicating in sound bites because they tend to provide just enough information to cause trouble. But, in this case I will make an exception. Here are five qualities to look for when selecting future leaders.

Does the person have integrity? A leader must be trustworthy.

Does the person communicate well? He or she doesn’t have to be a polished speaker or writer but should be able to get their point across clearly.

Does the person have a concern for other people? A leader who doesn’t care about other people will be a bad boss.

Does the person know themselves? A leader who doesn’t know his or her own strengths and weakness will be handicapped. That’s especially true because their subordinates will know these things.

Does the person have a clear sense of mission? How can a boss lead if he or she doesn’t really understand where they’re going?

Of course there’s a lot more to selecting future leaders, but this is certainly a good start.

Jan 31 2014

Trust and Leadership

Send to Kindle

Effective leadership relies on trust. A successful leader must develop the trust of workers, customers, and partners. Trust and leadership are inseparable.

The PR firm Edelman has released the 2014 Trust Barometer which has some valuable information for leaders. The barometer looks at various trust issues from more than 33,000 people in 27 countries. The report concerns trust, and the differences in trust, in government and business. It’s interesting to see that the public trusts business more than government by a wide margin and that trust in the media is declining.

The Barometer presents some nuggets leaders should consider. One is a list of actions that build trust. The number one action on that list is engagement; including listening and treating others with respect. Next is integrity; business ethics and taking responsibility for actions.

You probably learned these qualities in kindergarten, and yet they apparently still need to be mentioned.

Also in the study is a list of who people trust to provide information about a company. The highest rating went to technical and academic experts, then peers. Lowest on the list, though gaining an impressive 12% over 2009 are CEOs. How effective are you at establishing trust?

Finally, I was struck by a statistic concerning sources people trust for news about current events. Though elsewhere in the study, traditional media trust is declining, they are still the number one source for news but they’re tied with internet searches. That means if someone wants information about your company, someone like a prospective client or employee, they will most likely look on-line. What do you look like on-line?

Trust and leadership. Make the connection.

Jan 31 2014

Qualities of a Great Leader

Send to Kindle

Please take a minute to look at “7 Essential Qualities of Great Leaders” by Ritika Trikha at CareerBliss.com. Yes, I’m quoted, but it would be a good article anyway.

These are good tips for beginning leaders and great reminders for those of us who have been at it for awhile.

Jan 29 2014

What’s With the Millennials?

Send to Kindle

I sometimes wonder what the next two or three generations will be like. The question comes to me when I look at the Millennial Generation which seems, in many ways to be a combination of all the four generations that preceded them.

The Millennial Generation, born 1980 – 2000, is the largest in history at 83 million members. They are also the very epitome of the concept of generational diversity. They have been raised in many different situations and come from many different backgrounds making it very difficult to define them.

That doesn’t mean we don’t try. But, not all Millennials are computer geeks, or are covered in tattoos. Many of them actually can form complete sentences, and not all of them are constantly looking for a new job.

Yes they tend to be a little rebellious but no more so, and probably actually less so than Boomers were.

What is a little different is that during their formative years, society as a whole decided not to instill some basic skills that are common in the workplace. I can’t explain that, but it does mean that in the workplace, Millennials may need a little help. At the same time, somehow Millennials as a group developed a need to acquire new knowledge and develop new skills. That’s something any boss should love.

I’ve briefly discussed the five generations that influence today’s workplace. I hope you’ve noticed something: generations are actually a collection of people and those people are unique. So, to be most successful, get to know the people, not just the generation.

Jan 24 2014

Leading Multi-National Teams

Send to Kindle

It was a warm evening in Kuwait City. I was standing on a street corner talking to a local gentleman with whom I was working. As we chatted a young teen slowly cruised by with music blaring from his car stereo. After he passed and the noise level returned to normal we resumed our conversation. A few minutes later the same teen again cruised by the corner where we stood. My companion commented that he didn’t understand and asked me if young people did that in the United States. He seemed a little surprised when I told him they did.

Having worked with people from 15 other nations, in most cases in their country, I’ve come to understand we are often more alike than we realize. As the world becomes increasingly more connected, leading multi-national teams is becoming more likely and is a challenge leaders must be prepared to face. There’s much discussion these days about the many different cultures of the world and how we can all effectively interact but understanding two common factors will make the leadership challenge easier.

First, no matter the nationality of the members of your multi-national team, they appreciate the leader recognizing them for that nationality. This doesn’t mean the leader needs to make a big deal of it, but they each have a unique culture and want to know the leader cares enough to at least try to understand that. I’ve always found it fun to learn a little about the people and culture of another country. The knowledge I gain in one experience is often valuable in another. In the United States we fear being considered insensitive if we do not understand every nuance of every other culture, but, and I’m not naming any names here, I’ve run across some from other countries who are just as culturally arrogant. The point is, respect the differences, but don’t dwell on them.

The second factor should seem obvious, but is sometimes hidden in cultural differences. It’s simply this. I’ve never met anyone, from anywhere, who isn’t motivated by a need to be appreciated for what they can contribute to the team. They want to be recognized for their skills and abilities. Though your team members will have different ways of showing it, they appreciate the opportunity to be a valued part of the team.

Leading multi-national teams isn’t as difficult as it seems, and it can be fun and educational. Though sometimes it may be a little harder to see, you and your team are most likely motivated by the same needs. Learn a little about your team members, then treat them the same as you would like to be treated.

 

Jan 22 2014

What’s the Problem With Generation X?

Send to Kindle

A common grievance during the Boomer’s earlier years was “No one understands us.” That might have been at least partly true then, but the generation that can really lay claim to that lament is Generation X, born between 1964 and 1980.

Like the Silent Generation, Xers are caught between two very large and very loud generations. They are small, only about 37 million, and grew up during an unusual time in history when things were changing pretty rapidly bringing a lot of social change and uncertainty, especially in the home. Divorce rates were higher than ever, Boomers were out there acquiring, and families suffered.

Xers can be forgiven for feeling they’ve been pushed aside. In fact, much of the technology that is associated with Millennials would not be possible without the work of Xers. Once again though, the generation cannot be defined by a few single events. In fact, Xers tend to have two sides. The older members tend to lean more towards Boomers and the younger ones tend to lean more towards Millennials.

That makes Xers a unique and valuable group in the workplace. They can be a bridge between Boomers and Millennials since they have a foot in each generation. They certainly should not be discounted.

Jan 17 2014

Employee Surveys and Finding the Truth

Send to Kindle

Two different people in two totally different industries have contacted me in the last week to discuss employee surveys. In one case the company sent what they professed to be an anonymous opinion survey but the employees quickly discovered that there were markers which seemed to identify each survey with the person who completed it. In another case, the company decided to bring in leaders from other parts of the company to interview employees.

Both attempts were doomed to fail because there was a serious issue of trust.

Whether or not the first company really did produce an “anonymous” survey that wasn’t anonymous, it appeared that way to the employees who were already suspicious of the company’s motives. That company has established itself as dishonest and employees will not trust anything the company says in the future. Quite frankly, I expect this lack of integrity, whether actual or just perceived, will cause this company to fail.

The second company decided to send in mid-level leaders from other parts of the company to determine the reason for low employee morale. That sounds like a good plan, but a recent rash of dismissals and lack of information from their leaders has made the employees suspicious of everyone in the leadership ranks. This company’s efforts are commendable, but will probably not yield much useful information because of the lack of trust.

The common theme is trust. If employees don’t trust their leadership, they will not be open about problems in the company nor will they be inclined to suggest or pursue improvements. In both of these cases, the company has solicited employee opinions, but the employees don’t trust the company.

There are a few steps that leaders can take to begin to instill trust.

First, establish open lines of communication. Employees should be able to approach their management with problems and suggestions without fear of reprisals. What some find surprising is that the communication must go both ways and actually is more important from the top down. Leaders must be open and should pass as much information as possible to their employees. In one organization where I worked years ago we called ourselves the mushrooms because our leadership kept us in the dark and fed us; well you get the picture. You definitely do not want a company full of mushrooms.

Next, don’t ignore suggestions. Employees are very quick to get the message when suggestions are ignored. That doesn’t mean you have to adopt every suggestion an employee makes but you should at least acknowledge the suggestion and explain why you will or will not adopt it.

Third, solicit employee input. Doing this anonymously is a great idea, but it must be truly anonymous. In the second example, the company used a good technique by bringing someone in from the outside. I’ve done this myself and been pleased with the result. But, a word of caution. I didn’t necessarily like everything I heard. What I was pleased with was the opportunity to learn about problems I was not aware of so I could fix them.

Trust is difficult to establish and extremely easy to lose. Once lost it is very hard to regain. How much trust have you established?

Older posts «

» Newer posts