TRANSFORMING LEADERSHIP
  BY DEVELOPING GREAT LEADERS
THE PLAN - LEAD - EXCEL
LETTER
Newsletter Archives Plan-Lead-Excel Home



Get your copy now!

I'm proud to announce the release of my new book, Balancing the Generations: A Leader's Guide to the Complex, Multi-Generational, 21st Century Workplace

The book examines each generation, dispels common myths, and gives leaders tools to build a more effective organization by helping them recognize and take advantage of each generation's strengths.

If you were born between 1900 and 2000 and are in the 21st Century workplace, you need to read this book!





PLANNING TO EXCEL:
STRATEGIC PLANNING THAT WORKS



Get your copy now and Plan to Excel!




Plan for success
train your leaders to lead
and help them excel!!

With all the despair
about the economic situation,
this is the time
to plan and train
for a positive future.

Plan for success
and train your managers to lead!



Leading Change from a Higher Authority
By Bob Mason



The fundamental uniform fact in nature is constant change. Heraclitus.

Sometimes leaders initiate change. More often they must implement change that's initiated by someone else. That's not always an easy thing to do, especially when the change doesn't make sense or seems contrary to the good of the organization. What's the best way to manage change implemented by higher authority?

First, let's dispel a very persistent myth. From my first days as a new supervisor I was told that once a decision is made, I must move forward as though it was my own idea.

Hogwash!

I've never known anyone who could really pull that off. Those that try appear either insincere or out of touch with the realities of the organization. If you don't agree with a change, or feel it may be detrimental to the organization or its people, appearing to embrace it as your own will be a significant hit on your personal integrity. If you do that too many times, the internal conflict can even become a health issue.

So what's a leader to do? There's a simple method that works and will keep you straight with your people and yourself. But first you must accept that everyone answers to someone and must from time to time implement change they may not agree with. Leaders have two options: implement the change, or find another job.

The first step must occur long before any change is suggested. Gain a complete understanding of your organization and its people. Develop an open relationship that allows communication to flow both ways. It's essential for you to know what your people are thinking and for them to know you're concerned with what they think.

Then, when a change is suggested, you're prepared to address it and its effects on your organization. With that knowledge you can approach the boss with concerns and suggestions - privately. A public challenge puts the boss on the defensive making him or her much less likely to hear or accept your concerns.

When you've clearly expressed your thoughts and a decision has been made, you are obligated to implement the change to the best of your abilities. That can be difficult but it's what you must do.

The next step is to present the change to your organization. If you present the idea as your own, when it's clearly going to be a problem, your people will either think you haven't been listening to them and don't really understand, or that you have sacrificed them and your integrity for points with the boss. Either way is toxic for a leader.

Instead, clearly explain the pending change. If you presented a rebuttal, you can explain that, but don't bad mouth the boss. Simply say that the boss heard your concerns but felt it was necessary to proceed. If your rebuttal resulted in a modification of the original idea, you can mention that. It will show your team that you really have expressed their concerns. People want a leader to fight for them.

Finally, you must actually implement the change. Do this by telling your team that you need their help in finding the best way to approach this change and make it positive for the organization. Who knows, it might actually result in something good that no one anticipated!

As a leader, you're obligated to support your boss, but you must not trade away your integrity in the process. You can implement change you don't agree with while doing both.

Next month, implementing the boss's change.









Get a fresh new article every week to help you on your leadership journey.
Go to www.planleadexcel.com/Bobs-Blog




Are You a Leader or a Ruler?
By Les Taylor

A friend and I had a discussion this past weekend about the difference between being a leader and being a ruler. While I'll admit the discussion had a definite political bent, it did cause me to consider the differences. I decided to do a little homework and see what I could find regarding both titles. I started with definitions.

A leader is person who leads or commands a group, organization, or country.

A ruler exercises dominion.

While those descriptions are interesting, I think the primary distinction between the two is that a leader has the ability to influence - both people and outcomes. People follow leaders because they trust them. And they trust them because they believe in their ability to reach an intended goal or outcome. They trust them because they believe a leader has their best interests at heart.

But, I think there are some other distinctive differences between the two. Here's my take on the difference between a leader and a ruler

1. Leaders influence - Rulers demand: Demanding that certain actions be taken a certain way almost always leads to resentment. No one wants to be told what to do, how to do it or when to do it - especially today. Dictates and demands make us feel powerless, and this leads to resentment. If you're looking for mediocrity and a half-hearted effort, just demand something be done - without asking for input from those affected by the edict.

Leaders look for input. They want to know what others are thinking and they're always looking for better ideas and new ways of doing things. A leader doesn't fear a different opinion and doesn't consider someone who disagrees an enemy.

2. Leaders are transparent - Rulers... not so much: No one likes to think something is being hidden from them. When things aren't going well or mistakes have been made, it's always a good policy to simply admit it. Don't make excuses and don't make stuff up. Admit things aren't working out as planned and get input on how to fix the problem. Someone once said: "None of us is as smart as all of us." I'm not sure who to attribute that quote to but my guess is it was a leader.

3. Leaders listen - Rulers aren't interested in other ideas or opinions: You've heard that fifty percent of being a good communicator is being a good listener? I think being a good communicator means listening more than fifty percent of the time. Leaders want to know what's (really) going on - they don't assume they know. A good leader also wants to hear differing opinions.

Rulers have their own agenda and don't really care what others think. They're not looking for advice or opinion. They're looking for compliance.

4. Leaders focus on the positive - Rulers are faultfinders: Leaders encourage. They provide hope, support and confidence by maintaining a positive, encouraging attitude. We all want to know our efforts are appreciated and we all need positive reinforcement - especially when things aren't going well.

Rulers are finger-pointers. It's not about seeing what's working, it's about pointing the finger and blaming. Rulers rule through fear mongering and faultfinding.

5. Leaders play to the strengths of others - Rulers don't: Leaders surround themselves with people who have the strengths they personally lack. A good leader doesn't try to be a Jack (or Jill) of all trades. Leaders focus on their specific strengths and avoid trying to strengthen their weaknesses. Leaders delegate the things they don't do well to those who have the necessary skills to achieve positive results.

Rulers have a false sense of their own abilities. They believe they're where they are because of who they are - and grossly overestimate their abilities.

There you have it, my take on the difference between a leader and a ruler. It seems pretty obvious which of the two will lead effectively and create positive outcomes. Leaders are influential, transparent, good listeners, who focus on the positive, and play to the strengths of others.

Rulers, on the other hand, rely on position and power to get their followers (subjects) to do what they want them to do. They're not interested in differing opinions or input. Rulers are self-focused and, in their world, the ends justify the means

Given the choice, you want to be a people-focused leader.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Les_Taylor
http://EzineArticles.com/?Are-You-a-Leader-or-a-Ruler?&id=7167965






Finding the Next Leaders

During the selection process for new leaders, I always caution about "natural born leaders." While there are some people who seem more inclined to leadership roles than others, too often the selection process will favor people who seem to be natural leaders. What those people usually have is a charismatic ability to get people to take certain action. Isn't that what you want? Of course it is. The problem comes when the going gets a little tough and the leader must direct action that is unpopular. Charismatic leadership isn't really leadership at all. It's more of a personality trait and it only works when followers grant their permission to be so led. If personal charisma is all the leader offers, followers can and do quickly withdraw that permission.

That's not to say that someone who appears to have inherent leadership skills should be overlooked in your search. Only that they will require training and development just like others, but may be more resistant because they believe they already have the necessary skills.


A QUESTION ON LEADERSHIP

Should a leader provide opportunities for self actualization in the workplace?


Self-Actualization is a little complex. It's the highest level of people in the organization and you probably have very few of them. They can take you to new heights, but can also lead you off track. The good news is that for those who are at this level, there is very little need to provide special opportunities. A truly self-actualized person will find them anyway. But, that can also be a potential problem.

What the self-actualized person needs is your support. That doesn't mean just letting them go to do as they please. It does mean giving them the tools they need, and providing the guidance that will make them more effective. While the self-actualized person may not need as much support, they still need that guidance to keep them headed in the right direction.

Please send your thoughts and questions to comments@planleadexcel.com. I'll post them in the next edition.



  MORE STRANGE LAWS

In Rochester, Michigan, the law is that anyone bathing in public must have the bathing suit inspected by a police officer !

In New Jersey, cabbage can't be sold on Sunday.

In San Francisco, there is an ordinance, which bans the picking up and throwing of used confetti.

In the state of Colorado, a pet cat, if loose, must have a tail-light !

The law states that more than 3000 sheep cannot be herded down Hollywood Blvd. at any one time.

In Missouri, a man must have a permit to shave.

For even more strange laws go to strangefacts.com/laws.html

 



Follow Me!

RLM PLANNING AND LEADERSHIP
PO Box 50984
Albuquerque, NM 87181-0984
866-243-1682
www.planleadexcel.com
email rlm@planleadexcel.com

PLAN - LEAD - EXCEL